Constituents who have residency in Hungary, but work or study abroad for a prolonged period of time, and consequently are not going to be in Hungary on the day of the parliamentary elections, may only vote at the foreign embassies. In certain cases, this might necessitate a journey of several hundred kilometres, and entail considerable costs, or even prevent them from voting. At the same time, constituents who are going to stay abroad on the day of the election as well, but who do not have residency in Hungary, can vote by post, which is cheap, simple and convenient. HCLU, representing a constituent working abroad, has contested these discriminative rules at the Constitutional Court.

The Parliament naturally has   broad freedom when establishing the electoral rules, and it can freely determine the modes of voting. However, legislators can only use this freedom to create rules within constitutional limits: they are obliged to formulate these rules so that they do not impinge the provisions of the Fundamental Law, and do not constrain fundamental rights unconstitutionally. The Parliament may introduce or abolish the institution of voting by post, but it cannot do it unconstitutionally, or in a way that discriminates against any groups of constituents.

The ruling directly affects hundreds of thousands of Hungarian voters who are staying abroad to work or study, but have not renounced their Hungarian residency. According to the quick report of The Hungarian Central Statistical Office’s Demographic Research Institute, published in the summer of 2013, 7.4 % of Hungarian citizens between 18 and 49 who have residency in Hungary live permanently abroad. This estimated data means approximately 335,000 persons.

The law must not discriminate between citizens living abroad, based on the possibility of electoral fraud, when that possibility exists both in the case of citizens having and citizens not having Hungarian residence. The possibility of cheating depends solely on the appropriate procedural guarantees ensuring the realization of electoral procedural principles for voting by mail, similarly to voting personally at the election district after proper identification protects the purity of the elections, and voting by procedural guarantees ensures the voluntary nature of the participation in the electoral procedures. Gerrymandering and cheating in the elections must be counterweighted by procedural guarantees devised against such possibilities, and not by discriminative limitations of rights. Insofar as the legislators consider these guarantees appropriate and sufficient for voting via mail by constituents who do not have Hungarian residency, then they cannot be considered insufficient in reference to constituents who do have Hungarian residency. And vice versa, if the guarantees serving the elimination of gerrymandering are insufficient, then they are insufficient both for constituents having and not having Hungarian residency. In this case, however, the legislators should have repealed the institution of voting by mail not only for a part of the circle of constituents, but for the whole in general.

The motion can be downloaded here.

Megosztás: 

Kapcsolódó hírek

Kommentek

Hírek

Kedves Barátaink!
 
Köszöntünk Benneteket az International Network of Civil Liberties Organizations (INCLO) hírlevelének első kiadása alkalmából. A hírlevél címe ’Globális fejlemények a lelkiismereti szabadság és egyenlő bánásmód területén’.  Az INCLO olyan jogvédő szervezetek együttműködése, amelyek elkötelezettek – egyéb témák mellett – a lelkiismereti szabadsággal és az egyenlő bánásmóddal kapcsolatos kérdések kezelése iránt.
 
http://tasz.hu/
Az INCLO tagjai a következők: 
  • American Civil Liberties Union
  • Association for Civil

Freedom of religion and equality are fundamental rights, enshrined in human rights laws and constitutions around the world. This report, Drawing the Line: Tackling Tensions Between Religious Freedom and Equality, examines three interrelated aspects of these rights: religious freedom and equality for LGBT individuals, religious freedom and reproductive rights, and religious freedom as expressed through attire, hair, or other forms of religious appearance.

http://tasz.hu/

As organisations working to defend civil liberties and fundamental human rights across five continents, members of the International Network of Civil Liberties

http://tasz.hu/

In the face of the most serious migration crisis to hit Europe in the many years, the Hungarian government took legal and physical steps to stop refugees at the

Drug User activists from all around the world gathered in Budapest, to learn how to make movies to advocate for drug policy reform and harm reduction.

http://tasz.hu/

Regarding the history of the case it is important to note that in April 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) declared invalid the Data Retention Directive that unified the time frame of the retention of selective data by Internet and telephone services and determined the accessibility of data by authorities in the member states. According to the decision, the directive had exceeded the limits of proportionality concerning the right to privacy and protection of personal data, as it failed to establish guarantees that counterweigh such limitations. Despite the annulment of the directive, the Hungarian act allowing data retention still remained in force. The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) started litigation against Telenor in order to force the Hungarian Constitutional Court (CC) to repeal the unlawful act.

http://tasz.hu/

 

 

http://tasz.hu/

In the face of the most serious migration crisis to hit Europe in the many years, the Hungarian government took legal and physical steps to stop refugees at the

On 23 October 2013 rapper László Pityinger, known as Dopeman, was a speaker at a political demonstration arranged by political group Szolidaritás. During the demonstration the audience symbolically toppled and cut off the head of a statue representing the prime minister of Hungary. The rapper kicked the detached head which resulted in a criminal investigation. Dopeman will be represented by the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) during the procedure.

http://tasz.hu/

The investigation is based on the suspicion that Dopeman committed the crime of public nuisance. The HCLU argues that expressing a political view that does not violate

Freedom of religion and equality are fundamental rights, enshrined in human rights laws and constitutions around the world. This report, Drawing the Line: Tackling Tensions Between Religious Freedom and Equality, examines three interrelated aspects of these rights: religious freedom and equality for LGBT individuals, religious freedom and reproductive rights, and religious freedom as expressed through attire, hair, or other forms of religious appearance.

http://tasz.hu/

As organisations working to defend civil liberties and fundamental human rights across five continents, members of the International Network of Civil Liberties

Today the European Court of Human Rights concluded Hungary was in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the premature termination of the Hungarian Supreme Court’s President’s mandate in early 2012. The judgment confirms concerns of the HHC, the HCLU and the Eötvös Károly Institute that Mr Baka’s dismissal violated the independence of the judiciary, and was a further step in weakening the rule of law in Hungary.

http://tasz.hu/

Mr Baka was a former judge at the European Court of Human Rights (1991-2008). In 2009, he was elected by the Parliament of Hungary as President of the Supreme Court