Coffee Shops and Compromise: The Success of the Dutch Model

In 1976, the Netherlands separated the cannabis market from the market in other illicit drugs, and allowed coffee shops to sell small amounts of cannabis to adults in a controlled environment. Our new movie, supplementing the report of the Open Society Foundation, tells the story of the Dutch model and highlights its successes, as well as the challenges ahead of it.  

Coffee shops that sell cannabis are going through difficult times in the Netherlands: their number is shrinking because of new bureaucratic rules that make day-to-day management harder. The coffee shop, 'Wow', is a good example in Amsterdam: its distance from the nearest school is 241 metres, just 9 metres less than that required under a law introduced in 2008. As a result, the city ordered the coffee shop to close during school hours. More than 40 coffee shops had to close down in Amsterdam, just because of this rule. Many journalists and politicians in other countries tend to interpret these changes as signs of the failure of the "liberal Dutch cannabis policy", and use them as an argument against drug reform in general: "You see, even the Dutch have realised that their approach was a failure."

The reality, as usual, is much more complex. We can observe a conservative-populist shift in Dutch politics, as in many other European countries. But this does not mean that the Dutch drug policy model is a failure – actually we have evidence that it is more successful than the punitive drug policies in other European countries, not to mention the War on Drugs in the US. Cannabis use did not skyrocket, but remained stable in Holland; more important - drug-related death and disease are less prevalent than in many countries with restrictive drug laws. This is the conclusion of the report produced by the Open Society Foundations, authored by two excelent researchers, Jean-Paul Grund and Joost Breeksema. Click on the picture to download the report!

We also have evidence that the problems with regard to coffee shops, such as drug tourism, are problems related to prohibition and not to legal regulation (large scale cannabis cultivation is still illegal and this creates the "backdoor" problem). Recent measures to restrict the legal sale of cannabis have not proven to be effective in reducing the harms, but only fuelled the black market. The real solution to problems such as drug tourism and organised crime would be to create a legal, regulated cannabis market in the European Union.  

Text: Peter Sarosi
Video: Istvan Gábor Takács    

Megosztás

Kapcsolódó hírek

Keep It Low!

NeLP was initiated by the HCLU with funding from East-East Partnership Beyond Borders Program of Open Society Foundations. Watch and share our movie about the story of NeLP so far.

Discriminatory fines for motoring offences

In Borsod county in Hungary, Romas (who live in poverty and segregation) on bicycles are fined daily for motoring offences. They are regularly penalized for offences that they haven’t committed, alongside fines for petty offences, such as lack of lamps in broad daylight. The imposed fines are disproportionately high, and extremely difficult to repay. Due to the lack of information, the capacity for legal redress is very low in these peripheral communities. The word of a Roma man against a policeman’s is generally not taken seriously in these courts; penalized people are not able to defend themselves against such infringements on their rights. Does it make sense for the police force to spend tax-payers’ money and allocate its own resources for an undue and unnecessary penalization activity? Is it beneficial for our society to unduly penalize and criminalize the already underprivileged?

 

Now I ask the questions, and they answer

The aim of the Make your voice heard! project of the HCLU is to facilitate advocacy skills of Roma communities. Therefore, the HCLU trains Romani activists in freedom of information and in participatory rights. This obtained knowledge will help them gain insight into local decision-making processes. By having access to data of public interest and exercising participatory rights, their situation will improve so they can reach the social level of the less underprivileged majority.