Judicial Warrants Are Required for Government Surveillance

The Strasbourg court's decision in a case from Hungary declares once and for all that uncontrolled government surveillance is incompatible with European human rights standards.

  • Two lawyers won their case against the Hungarian state concerning legislation on secret surveillance.
  • The Hungarian government must now obtain judicial warrants for surveillance activities.
  • The decision by the European Court of Human Rights may be of interest to the whole of Europe.

The complaint submitted by HCLU's director of programs and one of its lawyers concerned whether it is sufficient to obtain the permission of a member of the government - a minister - for the authorization of secret surveillance with national security purposes, or if it is necessary to have an independent - preferably judicial - control over surveillance activities.

Control mechanism

As potential subjects of surveillance, the applicants claimed that their rights to privacy are violated if the interception is not accompanied by a control mechanism that is independent from the government and surveillance-gathering parties.This is especially true because, given the secret nature of this type of surveillance, concerned persons are usually unaware of the fact that they are being watched, and are therefore unable to enforce their rights protecting them from such activities.The same legislation was found constitutional by the Hungarian Constitutional Court in 2013, but now the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that it is incompatible with the Convention on Human Rights.Instead of mass, indiscriminate data gathering, the court's decision means that Hungarian authorities must obtain a judicial warrant to collect data on a case-by-case basis.

A ruling for the rest of Europe

The judgment has all the more weight since the decision was clearly not influenced by the terror threat in Europe, reinforcing the concept that judicial rulings should set the standards for government behavior, with only limited exceptions being allowed in extraordinary circumstances.

The Strasbourg ruling, as a consequence of which the Hungarian Parliament must reform its act on surveillance for national security purposes, may affect relevant practices in all European countries.

Image: http://compfight.com/

Megosztás

Kapcsolódó hírek

The case of Vértesi Power Plant: the Contracts of the State Enterprise in Liquidation are Public

In pursuance of the decision of the Municipal Court of Tatabánya, the indirectly state-owned Vértesi Power Plant Co. is obliged to hand over its contracts with System Consulting Co. from 2008, the documents of the internal inquisition carried out in the case of privatization and power trading of System Consulting Co., substantiating the damage suits and criminal accusation of Vértesi Power Plant in the spring of 2009, and the figures in connection with the costs of the internal inquisition to Tamás Bodoky, journalist, represented by HCLU.

The First Map of Budapest CCTVs Is Available Online

After two and a half years of litigations, the Supreme Court has reached its final verdict. Budapest Police Headquarters is ordered to issue data on the CCTV systems operated by the police in Budapest. Locations, and all information regarding the operational, financial, technical, legal and personnel aspects, as well as informing of the public and monitoring data is now considered public interest data.

Call for Amicus Briefs in Case Against Hungary's Data Retention Law

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union is urgently seeking amicus briefs to support its case against the Hungarian data retention law. The case is currently before the country's Constitutional Court.