The Hungarian data protection authority was conceived in sin

The judgment of the European Court on 8 April declared that the replacement of the institution of the data protection commissioner for the National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information was unlawful. The ruling has made it clear: a two-thirds mandate does not absolve the Hungarian state from complying with European norms.

According to the decision of the European Court, in abolishing the institution of the data protection commissioner coincidentally with the entering into force of the Fundamental Law on 1 January, 2012, the Hungarian state violated the law of the European Union. Every Member State of the EU is obliged to operate an independent data protection authority. The independence of the organization responsible for data protection necessarily involves the obligation to respect the period of mandate of the same institution. Abolishing the authority implied the elimination of the mandate of the independent data protection commissioner, which occurred before András Jóri, who had been elected to this office for six years, had a chance to fulfill his mandate.

The European Commission started proceedings against Hungary. Prior to that, Eötvös Károly Institute had warned the government that the Commission would pursue infringement proceedings against Hungary and condemn it for abolishing the institution of the ombudsman. Also, Eötvös Károly Institute, HCLU and the Hungarian Helsinki Committee jointly called José Manuel Barrosso's attention to the unlawful action. Today's judgment is the final move in this process that started back in 2011.

It is highlighted by those three organizations that by violating the independence of the data protection commissioner, the Hungarian state committed a breach of rights not only against the ombudsman, but also against all Hungarian citizens who are entitled to enjoy information privacy in Europe protected by an independent agency. The operations of a new institution created coincidentally with the act of violating independence cannot remedy this injury, as the decisions of the National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information are to be judged, in each specific case, by considering that this authority was established as a result of rights infringement, that is, it was conceived in sin.

Megosztás

Kapcsolódó hírek

The case of Vértesi Power Plant: the Contracts of the State Enterprise in Liquidation are Public

In pursuance of the decision of the Municipal Court of Tatabánya, the indirectly state-owned Vértesi Power Plant Co. is obliged to hand over its contracts with System Consulting Co. from 2008, the documents of the internal inquisition carried out in the case of privatization and power trading of System Consulting Co., substantiating the damage suits and criminal accusation of Vértesi Power Plant in the spring of 2009, and the figures in connection with the costs of the internal inquisition to Tamás Bodoky, journalist, represented by HCLU.

The First Map of Budapest CCTVs Is Available Online

After two and a half years of litigations, the Supreme Court has reached its final verdict. Budapest Police Headquarters is ordered to issue data on the CCTV systems operated by the police in Budapest. Locations, and all information regarding the operational, financial, technical, legal and personnel aspects, as well as informing of the public and monitoring data is now considered public interest data.

Passanger data agreement between US and EU

On 6 Oct, 2006 the European Union and the United States finally came to an agreement on sharing air passenger data.